- Setting clear and compelling direction. Employees value accurate information about where the company is heading, even if it's somewhat unclear during these times. By keeping the employees focused on the future direction, the employees will be working on the "same page," causing a more focused energy which is exactly what the company needs in tough times.
- Open and Honest Communication. When the news isn't all that positive, leaders can fall into a trap of thinking that no news is good news and that they'll only communicate when something is looking positive. In reality, the exact opposite is true and when there isn't any news to report, effective leaders communicate there is no news. The alternative to limiting the amount of communication is that the employees will eventually make up their own version of the news. This can be very dangerous because the made-up version of the news could be much worse than the reality.
- Continued focus on career growth. When we stop to think about employees' concerns during these economic, we usually assume the employees are only concerned about their current job and whether or not they'll be able to keep it in the near future. That's only half the picture, though. Employees also continue to think about their long-term futures as well. As they consider their long-term career plans, they look to their employers for help with continuous career development.
- Recognizing and Rewarding High Performance. The employers whose employee engagement scores increased from 2007 to 2008 recognize they still have to reward people who are working extra hard during these tough times. No, it's not necessarily easy to come up with the same kind of rewards in these economic times but it is possible, it just needs more sustainable innovation to be more efficient with limited funds.
- Employee Benefits that communicate commitment to employee. Employers who scored higher on employee engagement in 2008 did a much better job in the benefits area of the survey. It didn't necessarily mean the companies continued to pay more for the employee's benefits. In some cases, it just meant the companies did a better job communicating the benefits that were not going to change. The "no change" message, in and of itself, communicated a commitment on behalf of the employer that the employees security needs were going to satisfied.
Keeping a highly engaged workforce in place is always a challenging task for employers and it is especially tough today. The alternative though, is a workforce that begins to dis-engage which in turn starts to erode the positive experience for an organization's customer. When this cycle starts to develop, employee morale will naturally start to shake--leading to more disengagement. The real measure comes in our response to the challenge. How we respond will determine our ability to sustain high performance much like Sir Winston Churchill's reminder that "kites rise highest against the wind--not with it."
